Survival paradox between stage IIB/C and stage IIIA colon cancer: is it time to revise the American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM system?

INTRODUCTION: A survival paradox between T4N0 (Stage IIB/IIC) and Stage IIIA colon cancer exists, even after adjusting for adequate lymph node (LN) retrieval and receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy (C). We conducted a large hospital-based study to re-evaluate this survival paradox based on the newest 8th edition staging system. METHODS: The National Cancer Data Base was queried to evaluate 35,606 patients diagnosed with Stage IIB, IIC, and IIIA colon cancer between 2010 and 2017. The Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test were used to compare unadjusted overall survival (OS). Multivariable Cox proportional hazards model was used to determine the association of stage with hazard ratios adjusted for relevant demographic and clinical variables including ≥ 12 LNs retrieved and receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy. P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: The 5-year OS for optimally treated stage IIIA colon cancer (receipt of C) was 84.3%, which was significantly higher than stage IIB/C (≥ 12 LNs retrieved + C) (72.8%; P < 0.0001). Stage was an independent predictor of OS. Among optimally treated Stage IIIA patients, T1N1 had the best survival (90.6%) while stage T4bN0 (stage IIC) had the worst (70.9%) (P < 0.0001). Compared to stage IIB, stage IIC had a 17% increased risk of overall death while stage IIIA had a 21% reduction in death (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Stage IIB/C and Stage IIIA survival paradox persists even after accounting for receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy and adequate lymph node retrieval. Future iteration of the TNM system should take this paradox into consideration.

Medicaid Expansion Increases Access for Rural and Impoverished Patients with Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma in Southern States.

INTRODUCTION: Medicaid expansion (ME) impacted patients when assessed at a national level. However, of the 32 states in which Medicaid expansion occurred, only 3 were Southern states. Whether results apply to Southern states that share similar geopolitical perspectives remains elusive. We aimed to assess the impact of ME on pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) treatment in eight Southern states in the USA. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We identified uninsured or Medicaid patients (age 40-64 years) diagnosed with PDAC between 2011 and 2018 in Southern states from the North American Association of Central Cancer Registries-Cancer in North America (NAACCR-CiNA) research dataset. Medicaid-expanded states (MES; Louisiana, Kentucky, and Arkansas) were compared with non-MES (NMES; Tennessee, Alabama, Mississippi, Texas, and Oklahoma) using multivariate logistic regression. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Among 3036 patients, MES significantly increased odds of Medicaid insurance by 36%, and increased proportions of insured Black patients by 3.7%, rural patients by 3.8%, and impoverished patients by 18.4%. After adjusting for age, race, rural-urban status, poverty status, and summary stage, the odds of receiving radiation therapy decreased by 26% for each year of expansion in expanded states (P = 0.01). Last, ME did not result in a significant difference between MES and NMES in diagnosing early stage disease (P = 0.98) nor in receipt of chemotherapy or surgery (P = 0.23 and P = 0.63, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: ME in Southern states increased insurance access to traditionally underserved groups. Interestingly, ME decreased the odds of receiving radiation therapy yearly and had no significant impact on receipt of chemotherapy or surgery.

Adherence Rate to Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology Z0011 Trial Based on Breast Cancer Subtype.

BACKGROUND: The American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z0011 (ACOSOG Z0011 or Z11) trial demonstrated no survival advantage with completion axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) for patients with T1-2 breast cancer, 1 to 2 positive SLNs who received adjuvant chemoradiation therapy. More than 70% of the cohort had estrogen receptor (ER)+ tumors. There is paucity of data on the adherence rate to Z11, as well as a dearth of data on the applicability of Z11 for the different subtypes. We conducted a large hospital-based study to evaluate the adherence rate to Z11 based on subtypes. STUDY DESIGN: The National Cancer Database was queried to evaluate 33,859 patients diagnosed with T1-2, N1, and M0 breast cancer treated with lumpectomy with negative margins, and adjuvant chemoradiation therapy between 2012 and 2018. Patients were classified into 3 groups: (1) ER+/HER2-, (2) ER-/HER2-, and (3) HER2+ regardless of ER status. The revised Scope of the Regional Lymph Node Surgery 2012 was used to classify patients into those who underwent an SLN or ALND. Differences in use of ALND by subtypes were compared. The Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test were used to compare overall survival (OS). A p value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: For ER+/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-, ER-/HER2-, and HER2+ tumors, the rate of ALND was 43.6%, 50.2%, and 47.8%, respectively. The 5-year OS for SLN and ALND for the entire cohort was 94.0% and 93.1% (p = 0.0004); for ER+/HER2-, it was 95.4% and 94.7% (p = 0.04); for ER-/HER2-, it was 84.1% and 84.3% (p = 0.41); for HER2+, it was 94.2% and 93.2% (p = 0.20). Multivariable cox proportional hazard regression analysis demonstrated no significant survival differences between SLN and ALND (p = 0.776). CONCLUSIONS: Z11 is applicable for women with early N1 disease, regardless of subtypes. ALND did not confer a survival advantage over SLN. Despite this, up to 50% of patients who fit Z11 criteria continue to undergo ALND.

Early Cholecystectomy in Patients with Sickle Cell Disease with Uncomplicated Cholelithiasis Is Associated with Better Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Up to 85% of patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) will develop gallstones by their third decade. Cholecystectomy is the most commonly performed procedure in these patients. Cholecystectomy is recommended for patients with SCD with symptomatic cholelithiasis and leads to lower morbidity. No contemporary large studies have evaluated this recommendation or associated clinical outcomes. This study evaluates clinical outcomes after cholecystectomy in patients with SCD and cholelithiasis with specific advanced clinical presentations. STUDY DESIGN: The Nationwide Inpatient Sample was queried for patients with SCD and gallbladder disease between 2006 and 2015. Patients were divided into groups based on their disease presentation, including uncomplicated cholelithiasis, acute and chronic cholecystitis, and gallstone pancreatitis. Clinical outcomes associated with disease presentation were analyzed. Statistical analysis was performed using the Student's t -test, chi-square test, ANOVA, and logistic regression. RESULTS: There were 6,662 patients with SCD who presented with cholelithiasis. Median age was 20 (interquartile range 16 to 34) years and 54% were female patients. Cholecystectomy was performed in 1,779 patients with SCD with the most common indication being chronic cholecystitis (44%), followed by uncomplicated cholelithiasis (27%), acute cholecystitis (21%), and choledocholithiasis or gallstone pancreatitis (8%). On multivariable regression, advanced clinical presentation was the strongest predictor of perioperative vaso-occlusive crisis, which was the most common complication. Patients undergoing cholecystectomy for uncomplicated cholelithiasis were at lower risk than those with acute cholecystitis (odds ratio [OR] 2.37; 95% CI 1.64 to 3.41), chronic cholecystitis (OR 1.74; 95% CI 1.26 to 2.4), and choledocholithiasis or gallstone pancreatitis (OR 2.24; 95% CI 1.41 to 3.57). CONCLUSIONS: Seventy-three percent of patients with SCD have advanced clinical presentation at the time of their cholecystectomy. After cholecystectomy, perioperative vaso-occlusive events were significantly increased in patients with advanced clinical presentation. These data support screening abdominal ultrasounds and early cholecystectomy for cholelithiasis in patients with SCD.

Rural versus urban commuting patients with stage III colon cancer: is there a difference in treatment and outcome?

BACKGROUND: To evaluate if there are differences in outcomes for patients with stage III colon cancer in those from urban vs. rural commuting areas. METHODS: Data were evaluated on patients diagnosed with stage III colon cancer between 2012 and2018 from the Louisiana Tumor Registry. Patients were classified into rural and urban groups. Data on overall survival, time from diagnosis to surgery and time from surgery to chemotherapy, and sociodemographic factors (including race, age, and poverty level) were recorded. RESULTS: Of 2652 patients identified, 2159 were urban (81.4%) and 493 rural (18.6%). No age difference between rural and urban patients (p = 0.56). Stage IIIB accounted for 66.7%, followed by IIIC (21.6%) and IIIA (11%), with a significant difference between rural and urban patients based on stage (p = 0.02). There was no difference in the extent of surgery (p = 0.34) or tumor size (p = 0.72) between urban and rural settings. No difference in undergoing chemotherapy (p = 0.12). There was a statistically significant difference in receiving timely treatment for hospital volume (p < 0.0001) and poverty level (p < 0.0001), but no difference in time from diagnosis to surgery (p = 0.48), and time from surgery to chemotherapy (p = 0.27). Non-Hispanic Blacks were less likely to receive timely treatment when compared with non-Hispanic Whites for both surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy, (aHR 0.91, 95% CI 0.83-0.99) and (aHR 0.86, 95% CI 0.77-0.97), respectively. There was no difference in Kaplan-Meier overall survival curves comparing rural vs. urban patients (p = 0.77). CONCLUSIONS: There was no statistical difference in overall survival, time to surgery, and time to adjuvant chemotherapy between rural and urban patients with Stage III colon cancer.

Evaluating the Presence of a Stage IV Low-Grade Well-Differentiated Neuroendocrine Tumor of the Ileocecum: A Case Report with Evaluation of Staging Protocol of Neuroendocrine Tumors and Treatment Options Based on Current Available Evidence.

Neuroendocrine tumors (NET) are rare neoplasms that can originate throughout the human body. An initial treatment option includes upfront surgical resection of the primary tumor (pT) if the tumor can be localized. Current systemic therapy options following resection of the pT or with evidence of metastatic disease include somatostatin analogs, evorlimus, peptide receptor radionuclide therapy, cytotoxic chemotherapy, and interferon alpha among other less common therapy options. We present a case of a patient with a NET that originated in the ileocecal region. The patient underwent upfront surgical resection with a right hemicolectomy due to the location of the tumor. The pT was notable for extensive invasion into the visceral peritoneum and metastasis to nearby lymph nodes. However, despite being diagnosed as a stage IV NET, the Ki67 index was less than 1%, categorizing it as a low-grade well-differentiated tumor. Following resection of the tumor, there was no evidence of metastasis to the liver on the follow-up magnetic resonance imaging and recurrent somatostatin receptor overexpressing neoplasm on the Gallium-68 DOTATE PET/CT scan. Due to the juxtaposition of the low grade of the tumor and the high staging, several different treatment options were discussed with the main distinction being whether to base these options off of the stage or the grade of the tumor in the case. Low-grade well-differentiated NET have a good prognosis. On the other hand, stage IV NET and tumors that have metastasized to nearby lymph nodes and organs have an increased likelihood to reoccur and worse outcomes. Recommendations for NET based on current evidence have a lack of clarity in terms of when to undergo observation versus systemic therapy.

Is There Really a Difference in Outcomes between Men and Women with Hepatocellular Cancer?

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a male-dominated disease. Currently, gender differences remain incompletely defined. Data from the state tumor registry were used to investigate differences in demographics, comorbidities, treatment patterns, and cancer-specific survival (HSS) among HCC patients according to gender. Additional analyses were performed to evaluate racial differences among women with HCC. 2627 patients with HCC were included; 498 (19%) were women. Women were mostly white (58%) or African American (39%)-only 3.8% were of another or unknown race. Women were older (65.1 vs. 61.3 years), more obese (33.7% vs. 24.2%), and diagnosed at an earlier stage (31.7% vs. 28.4%) than men. Women had a lower incidence of liver associated comorbidities (36.1% vs. 43%), and more often underwent liver-directed surgery (LDS; 27.5% vs. 22%). When controlling for LDS, no survival differences were observed between genders. African American women had similar HSS rates compared to white women (HR 1.14 (0.91,1.41), p = 0.239) despite having different residential and treatment geographical distributions. African American race and age >65 were predictive for worse HSS in men, but not in women. Overall, women with HCC undergo more treatment options-likely because of the earlier stage of the cancer and/or less severe underlying liver disease. However, when controlling for similar stages and treatments, HCC treatment outcomes were similar between men and women. African American race did not appear to influence outcomes among women with HCC as it did in men.

Impact of Medicaid Expansion on Breast Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment in Southern States.

BACKGROUND: Medicaid expansion impacted patients when assessed at a national level. However, of the 32 states that expanded Medicaid, only three were Southern states. Whether results apply to Southern states that share similar geopolitical perspectives remains elusive. We aimed to assess the impact of Medicaid expansion on breast cancer diagnosis and treatment in 8 Southern states in the US. STUDY DESIGN: We identified uninsured or Medicaid patients (age 40 to 64 years) diagnosed with invasive breast cancer from 2011 to 2018 in Southern states from the North American Association of Central Cancer Registries-Cancer in North America Research Dataset. Medicaid-expanded states ([MES], Louisiana, Kentucky, Arkansas) were compared with non-MES ([NMES], Tennessee, Alabama, Mississippi, Texas, Oklahoma) using multivariate logistic regression and differences-in-differences analyses during pre- and postexpansion periods; p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Among 21,974 patients, patients in MES had increased odds of Medicaid insurance by 43% (odds ratio 1.43, p < 0.01) and decreased odds of distant-stage disease by 7% (odds ratio 0.93, p = 0.03). After Medicaid expansion, Medicaid patients increased by 10.6% in MES (Arkansas, Kentucky), in contrast to a 1.3% decrease in NMES (differences-in-differences 11.9%, p < 0. 0001, adjusting for age, race/ethnicity, rural-urban status, and poverty status). MES (Arkansas, Kentucky) had 2.3% fewer patients diagnosed with distant-stage disease compared with a 0.5% increase in NMES (differences-in-differences 2.8%, p = 0.01, after adjustment). Patients diagnosed in MES had higher odds of receiving treatment (odds ratio 2.27, p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Unlike NMES, MES experienced increased Medicaid insured, increased treatment, and decreased distant-stage disease at diagnosis. Medicaid expansion in the South leads to earlier and more comprehensive treatment of breast cancer.

Intraoperative Fluoroscopy-Assisted Localization of Small Bowel Gastrointestinal Bleeding.

Intraoperative management of refractory small bowel gastrointestinal bleeding continues to present challenges to surgeons, specifically, in localizing the source of bleeding. The need for operative intervention has decreased significantly with improved percutaneous radiologic techniques for embolization with good success rates. When percutaneous treatment methods fail, the surgeon is left with a variety of suboptimal options for localization if the pathologic source is not obvious on external inspection of the small bowel. This report describes a novel method for localizing small bowel gastrointestinal bleeding in those patients who have had previous coil embolization attempts at controlling small bowel gastrointestinal bleeding.

A Novel and Simple Method of Managing Thoracic Esophageal Perforation: The "ASSIST" Approach.

INTRODUCTION: Thoracic esophageal perforation (TEP) remains a therapeutic challenge that carries with it a high mortality. Because of its rare occurrence and management is complex, most patients are referred to higher level of care. Management is variable, ranging from a stent placement to an esophagectomy. Unfortunately, stent capabilities may not be readily available and the different surgical approaches can be complex, time-consuming, and demanding on a septic patient. Given these challenges, we conceived a simple 6-step (1) Antibiotics, (2) Suture the cervical esophagus with a 0- chromic, (3) Suture the abdominal esophagus with a 3-0 chromic, (4) Insert nasogastric tube above the sutured cervical esophagus, (5) Support nutrition with a jejunostomy, and (6) Tubes (placement of bilateral chest tubes). METHODS: Six consecutive septic patients with TEP who underwent an ASSIST approach were evaluated. On day 14, patients were taken to the OR for an esophagogastroduodenoscopy to open the cervical and hiatal esophageal closure. Patients then underwent a repeat barium swallow prior to resuming per oral (PO) intake. RESULTS: Sepsis resolved in all patients. One patient died of advanced cirrhosis. None of the living patients required additional surgery and all resumed a normal diet. CONCLUSIONS: The "ASSIST" method is a viable option for managing septic patients with thoracic esophageal perforation. This novel approach does not require a high level of technical expertise and conceivably be performed by most centers without the need for immediate transfer to specialized facilities.

Distance to radiation therapy facility influences surgery type among older women with early-stage breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Breast-conserving surgery plus radiation (BCT) yields equivalent or better survival than mastectomy for early-stage breast cancer (ESBC) women. However, nationwide mastectomy trends increased in recent decades, attracting studies on underlying causes. Prior research identified that long distance to the radiation treatment facility (RTF) was associated with mastectomy. Still, it is unclear whether such association applies to young and old ESBC women comparably. We sought to delineate such impacts by age. METHODS: Women diagnosed with stages 0-II breast cancer in 2013-2017 receiving either BCT or mastectomy were identified from the Louisiana Tumor Registry. We assessed the association of surgery (mastectomy vs. BCT) with the distance to the nearest or nearest accessible RTFs using multivariable logistic regression adjusting the socio-demographic and tumor characteristics. The nearest accessible RTF was determined based on patients' health insurance. For Medicaid, uninsured, and unknown insurance patients, the nearest accessible RTF is the nearest RTF owned by the government. The interaction effect of age and distance was evaluated as well. RESULTS: Of 11,604 patients, 46.7% received mastectomy. Compared with distance ≤5 miles to the nearest RTF, those with distance ≥40 miles or 15-40 miles had higher odds of mastectomy (adjusted (adj) OR = 1.39, 95% CI = 1.07-1.82; adj OR = 1.17, 95% CI = 1.02-1.34). To the nearest accessible RTF, the adj ORs were 1.25 (95% CI = 1.03-1.51) and 1.19 (95% CI = 1.04-1.35), respectively. Age-stratified analysis showed the significant association (p < 0.05) only presented among women aged ≥65, but not those aged <65 years. CONCLUSION: Distance to the nearest or nearest accessible RTF influences the surgery choice, especially among women in Louisiana ≥65 years with ESBC. Further understanding of factors leading to the decision for mastectomy in this age group is needed.

Outcomes of Breast-Conserving Surgery Plus Radiation vs Mastectomy for All Subtypes of Early-Stage Breast Cancer: Analysis of More Than 200,000 Women.

BACKGROUND: Recent large retrospective studies suggest that breast-conserving therapy (BCT) plus radiation yielded better outcomes than mastectomy (MST) for women with early-stage breast cancer (ESBC). Whether this is applicable to the different subtypes is unknown. We hypothesize that BCT yielded better outcomes than MST, regardless of subtypes of ESBC. STUDY DESIGN: Data on women diagnosed with first primary stage I to II breast cancer between 2010 and 2017 who underwent either BCT or MST were from the population-based 18 Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results cancer registries. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate unadjusted 5-year overall survival and cause-specific survival. Univariable and multivariable Cox proportional regression models were used to determine the impact of surgical approaches on the hazard ratios adjusted for relevant demographic and clinical variables for molecular subtype (luminal A, luminal B, triple-negative, and HER2 enriched). RESULTS: Of the 214,128 patients with breast cancer, 41.6% received MST. For the different subtypes, BCT yielded better 5-year overall survival and cause-specific survival than MST. After adjusting for demographic and clinical factors, the risk of overall survival and cause-specific survival was still statistically significantly higher among MST recipients than BCT recipients for all subtypes. CONCLUSIONS: BCT yielded better survival rates than mastectomy for women with all subtypes of ESBC. The role of mastectomy for women with ESBC should be reassessed in future clinical trials.

Trends in hepatocellular carcinoma in Louisiana, 2005-2015.

Introduction: Louisiana has one of the highest incidence and mortality rates of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in the nation. The aim of this study was to analyze the trends in HCC incidence and relative survival rates in Louisiana and compare them with corresponding national rates, which can be used to formulate strategies to improve Louisiana HCC outcomes. Methods: Data on primary invasive HCC diagnosed in patients 20 years or older between 2005 and 2015 were obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) program and Louisiana Tumor Registry. Time trends in HCC incidence and 12-month relative survival were analyzed using Joinpoint regression. Case characteristics were compared on 2 time periods (2005-2009 and 2010-2015) using Chi-squared tests. Cause-specific survival was analyzed via log-rank and multivariable Cox proportional hazard model. Results: Over the study period, the average annual percent change (AAPC) in age-adjusted HCC incidence in Louisiana was nearly double that of the national estimate, 6% (95% CI: 4.7, 7.3) compared to 3.1% (95% CI: 2.4, 3.7). 12-month relative survival among HCC patients in Louisiana was 40.7% (95% CI: 38.9, 42.4) which was significantly less than the US rate of 48.2% (95% CI: 47.8, 48.6). Relative survival did improve in Louisiana from 2000 to 2015 at a rate similar to that of the US (AAPC (95% CI): 2.9 (0.7, 5.2) vs. 2.7 (2.3, 3.1), p = 0.8). In multivariable survival analysis, factors amongst Louisianans associated with worse survival were older age at diagnosis, advanced stage of disease, and lack of surgical therapy. Conclusion: The incidence of HCC continues to rise more dramatically in Louisiana than in the US. While some modest improvements in HCC survival have been realized, outcomes remain dismal. Future work identifying the most at-risk populations are needed to inform statewide public health initiatives.

Value-based chronic care model approach for vulnerable older patients with multiple chronic conditions.

"Old age, itself, is not a disease" (Suborne 2007). The rising rate of the global aging population is predicted to create a health care crisis within the next three decades. Vulnerable older adults suffer from multiple chronic conditions (MCCs) in addition to cognitive and physical decline during the process of aging resulting in an inability to optimally achieve self-management. In terms of resource utilization, complex inpatient, and outpatient care results in higher physician visits, polypharmacy, and higher prescription costs. Health literacy has become known as an important social determinant of health affecting the older population. Both reductions in health literacy and self-management are associated with poorer health outcomes. The patient activation measure (PAM) has been coined "a vital sign" to ascertain a patient activation level throughout the continuum of care with the introduction of an intervention's progress. In this review, we conceptualize a systematic approach of the development of a "tailored" integrated community and care team to develop a partnership in assisting senior adults with MCCs. Through this intervention the value-based chronic care model (CCM) and PAM allows for an adaptable integration between the activated patient, their caregivers, and the community. The Model for Improvement (MFI) serves as a well-recognized technique for developing and executing quality improvement strategies in this "tailored" engaged and activated individual and community care team approach in achieving health outcomes and quality of life among the vulnerable older adult population worldwide.

Considerations for resuming global surgery outreach programs during and after the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic.

BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic has disrupted the delivery of safe surgical care worldwide. One specific aspect of global surgical care that has been severely limited is the ability for physicians and trainees to participate in global surgical outreach programs in low- and middle-income countries. METHODS: A narrative review of the literature regarding global surgical outreach programs during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic was performed. Factors that must be considered in the reinstatement of global surgical outreach programs were identified, and suggestions to address them were provided based on the available literature and the experiences of the senior authors. RESULTS: As global surgical outreach programs were canceled at the start of the pandemic, many academic surgeons turned to digital solutions to continue to engage with low- and middle-income country partners. With the advent of coronavirus disease 2019 vaccines and improved access to testing and treatment worldwide, the recommencement of global surgical outreach programs may begin to be considered. Important considerations before initiation include vaccine and testing availability for visiting providers, local staff, and patients, local hospital capacity, staff and equipment shortages, and the characteristics of the patient population and visiting providers. Region- and country-specific factors, including local infection rates and concomitant health crises, must also be taken into account. Expansion of digital collaborative efforts may further deepen international connections and promote sustainable models of care. CONCLUSION: With careful consideration, global surgical outreach programs may begin to be safely restarted in the near future. The current article evaluates individual factors that must be considered to safely restart global surgical outreach programs as the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic is better controlled.

Social determinants of health associated with poor outcome for rural patients following resected pancreatic cancer.

BACKGROUND: The impact of rurality on outcome for patients who had resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is unclear. We hypothesize that poor outcomes for rural patients are associated with adverse social determinants of health (SDoH). The objective of this study is to assess the difference in overall survival (OS) of PDAC patients between rural, urban, and contributing factors. METHODS: A cohort of 25,536 patients diagnosed with stage I-III pancreatic adenocarcinoma from 2003 to 2011 and underwent resection were evaluated from the National Cancer Database. Socioeconomic/demographic, clinicopathological, and treatment variables were compared between rural and urban residences. The 5-year OS was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The Cox regression model was used to assess factors associated with OS. P value <0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: In univariate analysis, the rural residence was a predictor of poor OS. The 5-year OS for rural (N=4,389) and urban (N=21,147) was 18.8% (95% CI: 17.4-20.2%) and 22.3% (95% CI: 21.6-22.9%; P<0.0001), respectively. The risk of all causes of death was 10.3% higher (P<0.0001) in rural than urban patients. In multivariable analysis, rurality was not an independent predictor of OS (P=0.407). Independent predictors of worse OS included adverse social determinants of health associated with the rural population and these included a low income (P<0.0001), low education level (P<0.01), low insurance status (P<0.01), and treatment at a low-volume facility (P<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Rural/urban outcome disparities for resected stage I-III pancreatic cancer outcome can be explained by adverse social determinants of health associated with rural population.